Byrne v. Carlow-Byrne, 2026 NSSC 105
- Prospective support was set on the payor's current income ($95,533 from new full-time work), not his 2025 income of $46,905. para. 14
- For the retroactive period, either the current year's or the previous year's income could be used; with no earlier order requiring annual disclosure or adjustment, the current year's income was more appropriate. para. 11
- No retroactive support was ordered: the payor had paid voluntarily since separation, often more than his income required, there was no blameworthy conduct, and no retroactive claim was made. para. 13
- Standard administrative recalculation provisions were included in the order at both parties' request; the court noted one party had wrongly assumed the Maintenance Enforcement Program would recalculate support. para. 15
When income has jumped, set out the retroactive figures both ways, as counsel did here with charts. If the parties want annual recalculation, ask for the recalculation program provisions in the order; the Maintenance Enforcement Program does not recalculate. More on drafting for enforcement